DevToolBoxKOSTENLOS
Blog

npm vs yarn vs pnpm vs bun: Welcher Paketmanager 2026?

10 Min. Lesezeitvon DevToolBox

Choosing the right JavaScript package manager can significantly impact your development workflow, CI/CD pipeline speed, and disk usage. The four major contenders in 2025 are npm, Yarn, pnpm, and Bun. Each has a different philosophy and set of trade-offs. This comprehensive guide compares all four across every dimension that matters: speed, disk efficiency, monorepo support, security, and developer experience.

What Is a JavaScript Package Manager?

A package manager automates the process of installing, updating, configuring, and removing third-party libraries (packages) in your project. It resolves dependency trees, manages versions via a lockfile, and provides scripts for building and testing your code.

Every modern JavaScript project depends on one. The differences between them may seem small at first, but they compound across large codebases, monorepos, and CI pipelines. Let us look at each one in depth.

npm: The Default Standard

History and Background

npm (Node Package Manager) was created by Isaac Z. Schlueter in 2010 and has been bundled with Node.js since version 0.6.3. It is the default package manager that every Node.js developer gets out of the box. The npm registry hosts over 2 million packages, making it the largest software registry in the world.

Key Features

  • Bundled with Node.js — zero setup required, available everywhere Node.js is installed
  • npm workspaces — built-in monorepo support since npm 7
  • npm ci — deterministic, fast installs for CI environments (deletes node_modules and installs from lockfile)
  • npm audit — built-in security vulnerability scanning
  • npx — execute packages without installing them globally
  • Overrides — force specific dependency versions to resolve conflicts
  • Provenance — npm now supports package provenance attestations for supply-chain security

Pros

  • Zero installation — comes with Node.js
  • Largest ecosystem and community
  • Excellent documentation
  • Stable and battle-tested
  • workspaces support for monorepos
  • npm audit for security scanning

Cons

  • Slowest install speed among all four managers
  • Higher disk usage — each project gets its own copy of every dependency
  • Historically had security issues (though much improved)
  • node_modules can grow extremely large (the "heaviest objects in the universe" meme)
# Install dependencies
npm install

# Add a package
npm install express

# Install dev dependency
npm install --save-dev typescript

# CI-optimized install
npm ci

# Run a script
npm run build

# Execute a package without installing
npx create-react-app my-app

Yarn: The Pioneer of Innovation

History and Background

Yarn was created by Facebook (now Meta) in 2016 to address npm's shortcomings at the time: non-deterministic installs, no lockfile by default, and slow performance. Yarn introduced the yarn.lock file and parallel downloads, which dramatically improved install speeds. Today, Yarn exists in two versions: Yarn Classic (1.x) and Yarn Berry (2.x+), which are fundamentally different tools.

Yarn Classic (1.x)

Yarn Classic works similarly to npm but with better performance and a more reliable lockfile. It uses a flat node_modules directory structure and supports workspaces for monorepos. While still widely used, Yarn Classic is in maintenance mode — the team recommends migrating to Yarn Berry.

Yarn Berry (2.x+) and Plug'n'Play

Yarn Berry is a complete rewrite that introduces Plug'n'Play (PnP), a radical approach that eliminates the node_modules directory entirely. Instead, it generates a .pnp.cjs file that maps package names to their locations in a compressed .yarn/cache folder. This results in:

  • Near-instant installs — no need to copy thousands of files into node_modules
  • Strict dependency resolution — prevents phantom dependencies (accessing packages you did not declare)
  • Zero-installs — commit the cache to git and skip npm install entirely in CI
  • Dramatically reduced disk usage

Key Features

  • Plug'n'Play (PnP) — eliminates node_modules, maps dependencies via .pnp.cjs
  • Zero-installs — commit cache to repo, skip install in CI
  • Workspaces — first-class monorepo support (pioneered this concept)
  • Constraints — enforce rules across workspaces (e.g., all packages must use the same React version)
  • Plugins — extensible architecture via plugin system
  • Offline mode — install packages without network access using cached archives

Pros

  • PnP provides fastest installs and smallest disk footprint
  • Zero-installs eliminates CI install step entirely
  • Excellent monorepo support with workspaces and constraints
  • Strict dependency resolution catches phantom dependency bugs
  • Plugin system for extensibility

Cons

  • PnP has compatibility issues with some packages and tools
  • Steeper learning curve, especially when migrating from npm
  • Two very different versions (Classic vs Berry) cause confusion
  • Smaller community than npm
  • Some IDE integrations require additional configuration for PnP
# Install dependencies
yarn install

# Add a package
yarn add express

# Add dev dependency
yarn add --dev typescript

# Run a script
yarn build

# Upgrade interactively
yarn upgrade-interactive

# Enable PnP (Yarn Berry)
yarn set version berry
yarn install

pnpm: The Disk Space Champion

History and Background

pnpm (performant npm) was created by Zoltan Kochan in 2017 to solve the disk space problem inherent in npm and Yarn Classic. Its key innovation is a content-addressable storage system: every version of every package is stored exactly once on disk, and projects link to those shared copies. If 10 projects use lodash@4.17.21, there is only one copy on your machine.

Content-Addressable Storage Explained

When you run pnpm install, pnpm does not copy packages into each project's node_modules. Instead, it creates a global store (usually at ~/.local/share/pnpm/store) where every unique file is stored by its content hash. Your project's node_modules contains hard links (or symlinks on Windows) pointing back to this store. This means:

  • Massive disk savings — packages are stored only once globally, not per-project
  • Faster installs — files are linked, not copied
  • Strict node_modules structure — prevents phantom dependencies by default
  • Integrity verification — content-addressed means files are verified by hash

Key Features

  • Content-addressable storage — global store with hard links, massive disk savings
  • Strict by default — only declared dependencies are accessible (no phantom deps)
  • pnpm workspaces — excellent monorepo support with filtering and parallel execution
  • Side-effects cache — caches postinstall script output for faster subsequent installs
  • Patching — built-in pnpm patch command to patch dependencies without forking
  • Catalogs — define shared dependency versions across workspace packages

Pros

  • Best disk space efficiency — saves gigabytes on machines with many projects
  • Fast installs (especially second time with warm store)
  • Strict dependency resolution by default
  • Excellent monorepo tooling with filtering commands
  • Drop-in replacement for npm (similar CLI commands)
  • Active development and growing community

Cons

  • Requires separate installation (not bundled with Node.js)
  • Hard links can confuse some tools and file watchers
  • Strict mode may break packages that rely on phantom dependencies
  • Smaller community and ecosystem than npm or Yarn
  • Some hosting platforms do not have built-in pnpm support
# Install pnpm
npm install -g pnpm
# Or use corepack (recommended)
corepack enable
corepack prepare pnpm@latest --activate

# Install dependencies
pnpm install

# Add a package
pnpm add express

# Add dev dependency
pnpm add -D typescript

# Run a script
pnpm run build

# Check disk usage savings
pnpm store status

Bun: The All-in-One Runtime

History and Background

Bun was created by Jarred Sumner and released its 1.0 version in September 2023. Unlike the other three, Bun is not just a package manager — it is an all-in-one JavaScript/TypeScript runtime that includes a package manager, bundler, test runner, and transpiler. Built from scratch in Zig (with JavaScriptCore instead of V8), Bun is designed for maximum performance.

Key Features

  • Blazing fast installs — written in native code, typically 10-25x faster than npm
  • All-in-one runtime — replaces Node.js, npm, webpack/esbuild, and Jest in one tool
  • Native TypeScript support — run .ts files directly without compilation step
  • npm-compatible — reads package.json, uses node_modules, compatible with npm registry
  • Built-in bundler — bundle JavaScript/TypeScript for production
  • Built-in test runner — Jest-compatible testing with bun test
  • Hot reloading — built-in watch mode with --hot flag
  • Node.js compatibility — implements most Node.js APIs for drop-in replacement

Pros

  • Fastest package installation speed by a significant margin
  • All-in-one tool reduces toolchain complexity
  • Native TypeScript execution without configuration
  • Drop-in Node.js replacement for most projects
  • Built-in bundler and test runner
  • Active development with rapid improvements

Cons

  • Relatively new — less battle-tested in production
  • Not 100% Node.js compatible (some edge cases and native modules may not work)
  • Smaller community and fewer Stack Overflow answers
  • Windows support was added later and may have rough edges
  • Monorepo support is less mature than pnpm or Yarn
  • Some npm packages with native addons may not compile with Bun
# Install Bun
curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bash
# Or on Windows
powershell -c "irm bun.sh/install.ps1 | iex"

# Install dependencies
bun install

# Add a package
bun add express

# Add dev dependency
bun add --dev typescript

# Run a script
bun run build

# Run a TypeScript file directly
bun run server.ts

# Run tests
bun test

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeaturenpmYarn (Berry)pnpmBun
First Release20102016 (Berry: 2020)20172023 (1.0)
Written InJavaScriptJavaScriptJavaScriptZig + C++
Install Speed (cold)SlowFast (PnP: Very Fast)FastVery Fast
Disk UsageHigh (copies per project)Low (PnP) / High (Classic)Very Low (shared store)Medium (node_modules)
Lockfilepackage-lock.jsonyarn.lockpnpm-lock.yamlbun.lockb (binary)
Monorepo SupportWorkspaces (basic)Workspaces + ConstraintsWorkspaces + FilteringWorkspaces (basic)
Phantom Dep PreventionNoYes (PnP)Yes (strict by default)No
Node.js BundledYesNo (use corepack)No (use corepack)No (is its own runtime)
Security Auditnpm audit (built-in)yarn auditpnpm auditNot built-in
Offline ModeCache-basedZero-installs (excellent)Store-basedCache-based
Dependency PatchingVia overridesyarn patchpnpm patchpatch-package

Install Speed Benchmarks

The following benchmarks are based on a typical medium-sized project (~500 dependencies) on a modern machine. Times are approximate and can vary based on network conditions, cache state, and hardware.

ScenarionpmYarn (Berry)pnpmBun
Cold install (no cache)~45s~25s~20s~5s
Warm install (cached)~20s~1s (zero-install)~5s~2s
CI install (clean)~35s (npm ci)~15s~12s~4s
Add single package~8s~4s~3s~1s
Note: Benchmarks are illustrative. Always test with your own project, as results vary significantly based on dependency tree shape, network speed, and operating system.

Migration Guides

Switching between package managers is usually straightforward. Here are the key steps for each migration path.

Migrating from npm to pnpm

pnpm is designed as a drop-in replacement for npm, making migration simple:

# Step 1: Install pnpm
corepack enable
corepack prepare pnpm@latest --activate

# Step 2: Remove npm artifacts
rm -rf node_modules package-lock.json

# Step 3: Install with pnpm
pnpm install

# Step 4: Update scripts in package.json
# Replace "npm run" with "pnpm run" in CI configs

# Step 5: Add packageManager field
# "packageManager": "pnpm@9.x.x"

Migrating from npm to Yarn Berry

Migrating to Yarn Berry requires a few more steps, especially if you want PnP:

# Step 1: Enable Yarn via corepack
corepack enable
yarn set version berry

# Step 2: Remove npm artifacts
rm -rf node_modules package-lock.json

# Step 3: Install with Yarn
yarn install

# Step 4: Configure PnP (optional but recommended)
# Add to .yarnrc.yml:
# nodeLinker: pnp

# Step 5: Add SDK for your editor
yarn dlx @yarnpkg/sdks vscode

# Step 6: Add to .gitignore
# .yarn/*
# !.yarn/cache
# !.yarn/patches
# !.yarn/plugins
# !.yarn/releases
# !.yarn/sdks
# !.yarn/versions

Migrating from npm to Bun

Bun reads your existing package.json and can use npm's registry directly:

# Step 1: Install Bun
curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bash
# Windows: powershell -c "irm bun.sh/install.ps1 | iex"

# Step 2: Remove npm artifacts
rm -rf node_modules package-lock.json

# Step 3: Install with Bun
bun install

# Step 4: Update scripts
# Replace "node" with "bun" in scripts
# Replace "npm run" with "bun run"
# Replace "npx" with "bunx"

# Step 5: Test everything
bun test
bun run build

General Migration Tips

  • Test thoroughly — run your full test suite after migrating
  • Update CI/CD — update your pipeline configs to use the new package manager
  • Lock files — delete the old lock file before generating the new one; never have two lock files
  • Team alignment — ensure everyone on the team switches at the same time
  • corepack — use corepack enable to manage package manager versions consistently across the team
  • Engines field — add a packageManager field to package.json to enforce the correct package manager

When to Use Which: Recommendations

Use npm When...

  • You want zero-setup — npm comes with Node.js, no extra installation needed
  • You are working on small to medium projects where install speed is not critical
  • You are a beginner and want the largest community for troubleshooting
  • Your team does not want to learn a new tool
  • You need the widest compatibility with tutorials, guides, and Stack Overflow answers

Use Yarn Berry When...

  • You want the fastest possible CI pipelines with zero-installs
  • You run a large monorepo and need constraints to enforce consistency
  • You want strict dependency resolution to catch phantom dependency bugs
  • Your team is willing to invest time in learning PnP and resolving compatibility issues
  • Offline development capability is important to your workflow

Use pnpm When...

  • Disk space is a concern — you have many projects on one machine
  • You want a drop-in npm replacement that is faster and more efficient
  • You run monorepos and want powerful filtering and parallel execution
  • You want strict dependency resolution without the learning curve of PnP
  • You are building for production and want a proven, stable tool

Use Bun When...

  • Raw speed is your top priority
  • You want an all-in-one tool (runtime + package manager + bundler + test runner)
  • You are starting a new project and can tolerate some compatibility edge cases
  • You are building TypeScript projects and want native TS execution
  • You are willing to be an early adopter and help shape the ecosystem

For most teams in 2025, pnpm offers the best balance of speed, disk efficiency, and compatibility. If you are starting fresh and want cutting-edge performance, Bun is worth evaluating. If you already use npm and things work fine, there is no urgent need to switch — npm has improved significantly in recent versions.

Using Corepack to Manage Package Managers

Corepack is a tool bundled with Node.js (since v16.9.0) that lets you manage Yarn and pnpm versions without installing them globally. It ensures everyone on your team uses the exact same version of the package manager.

Here is how to use Corepack:

# Enable corepack (bundled with Node.js 16.9+)
corepack enable

# Use a specific Yarn version
corepack prepare yarn@4.1.0 --activate

# Use a specific pnpm version
corepack prepare pnpm@9.0.0 --activate

# Verify the active version
yarn --version
pnpm --version

Add the packageManager field to your package.json to enforce a specific version:

{
  "name": "my-project",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "packageManager": "pnpm@9.1.0",
  "engines": {
    "node": ">=18.0.0"
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Is pnpm faster than npm?

Yes, pnpm is significantly faster than npm in most scenarios. On cold installs, pnpm is typically 2-3x faster than npm. On warm installs (when the global store already has the packages), pnpm can be 4-5x faster because it only needs to create hard links rather than copy files. The speed advantage is even more pronounced on machines with many projects sharing the same dependencies.

Can I use Bun as a drop-in replacement for Node.js?

For most applications, yes. Bun implements the majority of Node.js APIs including fs, path, http, crypto, and others. However, some native Node.js modules (using node-gyp/N-API) may not work, and there are edge cases in the Node.js API surface that Bun has not yet implemented. Always test thoroughly before switching a production application from Node.js to Bun.

What is a phantom dependency and why does it matter?

A phantom dependency is a package your code imports that is not listed in your package.json but happens to exist in node_modules because it is a dependency of one of your declared dependencies. This works by accident with npm's flat node_modules structure. It becomes a problem when the indirect dependency is updated or removed, breaking your code unexpectedly. pnpm and Yarn PnP prevent phantom dependencies by default, making your dependency tree explicit and reliable.

Should I commit the lockfile to git?

Absolutely yes. The lockfile (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, or bun.lockb) ensures that every developer and CI server installs exactly the same dependency versions. Without it, you may get "works on my machine" bugs caused by different dependency resolutions. Always commit your lockfile and never add it to .gitignore.

Can I use pnpm or Yarn in a project that was set up with npm?

Yes. Both pnpm and Yarn can read your existing package.json. To migrate, delete node_modules and the old lockfile (package-lock.json), then run the install command for your new package manager (pnpm install or yarn install). The new tool will generate its own lockfile. Test your application thoroughly after migrating to ensure everything works correctly.

Why is Bun's lockfile binary instead of text?

Bun uses a binary lockfile (bun.lockb) for performance — binary files are faster to read and write than text-based formats like JSON or YAML. The trade-off is that you cannot easily read or diff it in pull requests. You can generate a human-readable version with bun install --yarn to output a yarn.lock-style text file, or use bun.lockb --hash to verify integrity. As of Bun 1.1+, you can also use bun install --save-text-lockfile to generate a text-based bun.lock file.

𝕏 Twitterin LinkedIn
War das hilfreich?

Bleiben Sie informiert

Wöchentliche Dev-Tipps und neue Tools.

Kein Spam. Jederzeit abbestellbar.

Verwandte Tools ausprobieren

{ }JSON FormatterYMLYAML Validator & Formatter.gi.gitignore Generator

Verwandte Artikel

JSON vs YAML vs TOML: Welches Config-Format sollten Sie verwenden?

Vergleichen Sie JSON, YAML und TOML Konfigurationsformate.

npm install Fehler: Jeder hÀufige Fehler und die Lösung

Beheben Sie alle npm install Fehler: EACCES, ERESOLVE, ENOENT, EPERM.